HEALTH SOCIAL WORKERS' PERSPECTIVES ON PRACTICE WITH PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN THE ERA OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: AN EXPLORATORY-DESCRIPTIVE STUDY

ABSTRACT

People with disabilities have begun to call attention to their need for increased inclusion and self-determination regarding decisions affecting the course of their treatment by health and rehabilitation providers. At the same time, administrators have been implementing managed care policies which seek to control costs by limiting the range options available to health care practitioners and their clients. This suggests that some health practitioners may be facing difficult choices about how to adequately respond to the concerns as well as the independent living goals of disabled people.

As indicated by the graphic image above, this study explored the knowledge and practice perspectives of social workers employed in health organizations regarding: (1) their knowledge about major shifts in disability law, policy and the independent living needs and desires articulated by people in the disability rights movement; (2) their perspectives on the receptivity of administration in their organizations to disability issues and to suggestions for changes brought by social workers; and (3) the practice modalities and techniques they use when working with people with disabilities.

During the spring and summer of 1995, a purposive sample of 286 social workers employed in 57 health and rehabilitation organizations in California and Washington responded to a survey questionnaire developed for this study. Several major findings were generated: (1) Most respondents were knowledgeable about recent disability legislation such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, and were familiar with a limited number of the major issues advocated by disability rights authors and leaders. (2) Respondents tended to feel that their organizations were flexible and responsive to the requests and needs of disabled people. Moreover, they generally felt that social workers and their departments were influential in their organizations. (3) Virtually all respondents believed that direct services, community practice and advocacy practice were important parts of their roles in helping disabled people. However, while most respondents indicated that they generally were quite engaged in clinical activities with disabled people and their families, they reported relatively little actual community and advocacy practice activity.

Homepage
Research and Publication
Email